Most AI plans fail somewhere between the slide and the shop floor. A step gets scheduled before the thing it depends on exists, a business case counts the saving but not the rework, or a safety review is assigned to someone who has no time to perform it. In this module you build the core of your advisory package for a global manufacturer: a transformation roadmap, an ROI business case, and a governance and risk plan. You begin by testing the roadmap the client already holds, one initiative at a time, and then redraw it across three horizons with a clear gate for every step. You treat a pending four-year platform agreement as a bet on the provider’s finances, not only on its product. You price your priority investment after subtracting the work it shifts onto others, and you test every human review the plan relies on against the load its reviewer actually faces. The three parts check one another, so expect a later part to change an earlier one.

Six sound documents do not make a sound recommendation. Each part of your advisory package was written for its own purpose, and the places where one part quietly assumes what another denies are exactly where no one was responsible for checking. In this module you integrate the six parts into a single package for a global manufacturer’s AI steering group. You read the parts side by side, find each contradiction, and resolve it by changing the part that is wrong. You write a one-page executive summary that opens with your recommendation and closes with decisions the steering group can answer yes or no, and you test each major finding against its strongest objection. You build a six-slide storyboard whose titles alone tell the argument. Finally, you plan how to deliver your hardest finding to the person who least wants to hear it: early, plainly, and with options they can act on.